Enter any Latin word — inflected or not. You get every structurally valid morphological reading from the Lingua Sacra analyzer, and the Lewis & Short entry for each lemma it resolves to.
Try
enimnormalized · enim1 analysis · 1 lemma
Lemma 1ĕnĭm
conjunction
namely (postpos.); indeed; in fact; for; I mean, for instance, that is to say
Morphology1 analysis
inv.enim · regular
Lewis & Short
key · enim
ĕnim
I. [ of ĕ for pronom. stem i, and nam], a demonstrative corroborative particle. (Its position is regularly after the first word, or the first two or more closely connected words in the sentence — Sometimes it divides an apparent compound: )
II.To corroborate a preceding assertion, like equidem, certe, vero; hence connected with these particles, with vero ( under B.), truly, certainly, to be sure, indeed, in fact: Ch. Te uxor aiebat tua Me vocare. St. Ego enim vocari jussi, certainly, I did order you to be called; Th. Quid tute tecum? Tr. Nihil enim, nothing truly; Pa. Quid metuis? Se. Enim ne nosmet perdiderimus uspiam. — too in ironical or indignant discourse: Goer.; Ca. Faxo haut tantillum dederis verborum mihi. Me. Nempe enim tu, credo, me imprudentem obrepseris, yes, indeed, I believe you are trying to take me in.
B.Strengthened by vero, and combined with it into one word, ĕnimvēro (unlike enim, usually beginning the sentence), yes indeed, yes truly, of a truth, to be sure, certainly, indeed — In corroborating replies ( certe, I. A. 2.): Me. Ain vero? So. Aio enimvero; Sy. Eho, quaeso, an tu is es? Ch. Is enim vero sum: Al. Tun' te abisse hodie hinc negas? Am. Nego enimvero: Pa. Incommode hercle. Ch. Immo enimvero infeliciter. — And in ironical or indignant discourse: Da. Ubi voles, arcesse. Si. Bene sane.
III.
A.To prove or show the grounds of a preceding assertion, for: haec sunt non nugae — In parenthetical sentences.
2.Sometimes the assertion, the reason for which is given, is to be mentally supplied; Am. Qui istuc potis est fieri, quaeso, ut dicis, jam dudum, modo? Al. Quid enim censes? te ut deludam contra? , what then do you think? — the expression: quid enim dicam? commonly ellipt.: quid enim? qs. for what can be objected to the assertion just made? quid enim de T. Tatio Sabino dicam.
B.To explain a preceding assertion, for instance, namely: Sy. Si futurum est, do tibi operam hanc. Mi. Quomodo? Ut enim, ubi mihi vapulandumst, tu corium sufferas; Metuo maxime. Pa. Quid metuis? Sc. Enim ne nos nosmet perdiderimus: Lu. Di me perdant, si bibi, Si bibere potui. Pa. Qui jam? Lu. Quia enim obsorbui, why because: non igitur videtur nec frumentarius ille Rhodios nec hic aedium venditor celare emptores debuisse. Neque enim id est celare, quicquid reticeas.
Ambiguity is kept
Every structurally valid lemma-analysis pair is shown. Nothing is silently collapsed to a single preferred parse.
Ordering is not judgment
Candidates are ordered by Collatinus lemma frequency from the LASLA corpus — classical counts, not Ecclesiastical or Vulgate measurements.
Spelling is normalized
æ → ae, œ → oe, j → i, v → u, and vowel-quantity marks are stripped before lookup. The form you typed is preserved above.
Where this comes from
Built by the Lingua Sacra Institute.
This dictionary runs on the same morphological analyzer that powers the Lingua Sacra Reader. The Institute's other Latin learning resources live at linguasacra.org All of them free, or as low-cost as we can make them.